Australia’s job websites have been a hot topic of conversation in recent months, and one that is expected to continue this week.
But a new study suggests the country’s job sites are often a bit less reliable than they appear.
A report commissioned by job seekers’ association AUSTRAC suggests there are at least three ways that job seekers can get a job online that are at odds with the job websites that are widely used by employers.
AUSTRACA has recommended that employers be careful about using job sites as a way to find the best job available in Australia.
It says the websites should not be used as a tool to locate suitable candidates.
The survey, conducted by the Job Seekers Association, looked at the websites of 10 job seekers across a range of industries including engineering, health and education.
The jobs found in the study were listed in job postings that were either provided by the companies, were advertised by them, or were available for hire through their sites.
The research found the job seekers were more likely to be able to locate the jobs advertised through their job sites, and that they were more confident about finding them.
However, it found that people who had been searching online for a job for a few months were more unlikely to be offered jobs.
While some of the sites were able to provide the jobs they advertised, others were not.
The study found that while people searched online for the jobs listed on the job sites they were less likely to find them through their search engine.
The most popular search engine was Google.
Google has about 50 per cent of the jobs in the survey, and is the most popular job search tool.
However the survey found that more than 40 per cent said they did not use the job search feature, and were unable to locate a job advertised through the sites.
When people searched for the names of the people they thought were interviewing for a particular job, only 15 per cent were able “to find a job” on their own.
When people were asked which companies offered the best quality of services, only 10 per cent would provide the job with the highest quality of work, compared to 23 per cent who would say the same about the job listed on their job search.
The biggest difference was for the types of services provided.
For example, people were more interested in a job that was a paid position, and less interested in jobs that were paid casual.
The AUSTRAAC report also found that job vacancies were more prevalent on the jobs sites that were not advertised, compared with the jobs that had advertised themselves.
However, the study found job vacancies on the online job sites were more often than on the paid jobs.
The results are consistent with other research, including a report from recruitment firm CareerBuilder.
It found that online job listings were less reliable, but it said it was important to be cautious when using them to find work.
“There’s no doubt the best online job listing is the one you see first, but the best of both worlds can also be found on a paid job listing,” Mr Vignes said.
“The difference is that the online listings have a greater chance of being successful and attracting the right candidates, so if the job listing isn’t as good as the job itself, then it’s probably not going to be the one that you want.”
Topics:jobs,job,internet-technology,jobs,jobs-and-education,employment,education,human-interest,internet,technology,online-business-services,jobsFirst posted September 01, 2018 12:23:42Contact Greg HarkerMore stories from New South Wales