When a Nigerian blogger is forced to go underground due to the government’s crackdown on her online life

Nigeria is one of the most impoverished countries in the world, with a population of just 1.4 billion people.

But for a blogger known only as Shanti, who works for a Nigerian magazine called News.com, her precarious existence has become a source of daily dread.

Since the end of a war with Boko Haram in 2014, the government has cracked down on bloggers, arresting them on spurious charges, and sentencing them to prison terms ranging from four months to life.

Shanti and many of her colleagues have fled Nigeria for the United States, where they have found refuge.

But the Nigerian government is not done with Shanti.

In a recent move, it has also launched a crackdown on social media, banning nearly every social media site in the country.

On June 24, the Ministry of Information and Communications ordered Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Google+ and LinkedIn to remove all posts, tweets and other social media content that contain the word “Nigeria,” which is a term used to describe the country’s military rulers.

Shanto and her colleagues were among more than 400 people arrested over the past three days, according to a statement from the Ministry.

“The government is taking this issue seriously,” the statement said.

“The authorities are trying to stop the spread of this hateful propaganda.

We are not here to promote the war on Boko Haram.

We have no agenda or plan to promote any political party or cause.”

The ministry added that the arrestees had also violated a court order and are being held in detention centers.

The government’s move against social media comes as it is facing increasing criticism for its repressive policies against civil society and activists, which have resulted in the arrest of tens of thousands of people since 2013.

The country has been at the forefront of the global push for democracy and human rights, with the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights calling it “one of the worst violators of human rights.”

According to the World Press Freedom Index, published annually by the Reporters Without Borders, Nigeria ranks 142nd out of 180 countries in terms of freedom of expression and press freedom.

It has been accused of systematically stifling civil society, including by blocking access to foreign media.

The Nigerian government has long blamed Boko Haram for the violence and killings, saying that the group’s violence was triggered by the government, not by a desire to topple the regime of President Goodluck Jonathan.

The government has also blamed the group for the abduction of more than 200 schoolgirls from Chibok in northeast Nigeria.

The Nigeria government has repeatedly denied that Boko Haram is responsible for the abductions.

In February, Prime Minister Muhammadu Buhari, who has pledged to defeat Boko Haram, said that the government was simply following the “right laws and procedures” and that the abduction “has nothing to do with Boko [Boko Haram].”

The Nigerian media and human-rights groups have also criticized the government for its handling of the Boko Haram insurgency.

In June, the United Nations Human Rights Council said the government failed to prevent Boko Haram from beingheadings, abductions and other abuses, while saying the government should have prevented the killings of the girls.

In an open letter published in July, the UN Commission of Inquiry on Nigeria said the country was “facing a crisis of impunity that threatens the rule of law and undermines the capacity of law enforcement to prevent crimes.”

“The Government of Nigeria must not allow the emergence of new and credible threats to its rule of a country of approximately 5.8 million people,” the letter said.

“It must not permit the emergence, or the expansion of, a network of criminal organizations capable of perpetrating crimes and crimes against humanity, including against children.”

When it comes to Amazon and iKEA, the battle of convenience is coming to Japan

With the release of its latest smartphone, Amazon has made its first foray into Japan with the release the iKon 2.

The first thing you notice about this smartphone is its price.

The iKON 2 costs 1,849 yen (US$200), and you can buy the device for 1,999 yen (about US$300).

That’s an amazing amount of money.

If you’re looking for something a little more portable, you can get the iBook 3 for 1.5 times as much.

In terms of the overall cost of the iKEa product, the price goes down to 5,299 yen (around US$2,100).

But wait, that’s not all.

This is where the similarities to Apple and Google come into play.

While the iKeon 2 is priced at 5,999, the iBooks are sold at 1,991.

This difference in price comes with the additional cost of shipping.

In this case, the cost of an iKEas shipping is 4,993 (US $4,100), while the cost to ship an iBooks is 5,000 (US 10,000).

The difference between these two pricing schemes means that the iKOons are selling for around the same amount.

But that difference is just one of the many differences between the two products.

For a start, the Japanese version of iKEAs have a much bigger selection of books than the US versions.

The Japanese version is limited to around 1,000 titles, while the US version has a much larger selection.

This means that there are far more iKEan books on the iBanks site than on Amazon.

That means that you’re likely to see more titles on the Japanese iBank site than you will on Amazon, meaning that the difference between the prices on the two sites can be significant.

In addition, the pricing on Amazon is higher than the prices of the other iKEs.

The difference in the prices is even bigger when you consider that iKons retail price starts at 1.9999 yen (the price of the Apple iBook) and ends up at 4,999 (the US price).

Amazon is charging the same price for both the US and Japanese versions, which is also true of other devices such as the Kobo iBook, the Kindle Fire and the Kindle 3.

This leads to the argument that Amazon’s pricing is higher because of its global reach, while iKO’s pricing comes from its global footprint.

Both companies are selling their products in multiple languages, but Amazon sells its products in Japanese, German, French, Chinese, Korean and Portuguese.

While both Amazon and the iKIas have global reach and appeal, they are not the same.

In a way, it’s an interesting question whether or not the differences between Amazon and its rivals are actually the same as the differences that Amazon has to offer.

In Japan, the difference is a matter of geography, not geography itself.

With the arrival of iBeacon, Amazon is able to sell its devices to Japanese people in other languages.

However, for its Japanese customers, Amazon doesn’t have a global reach.

And for that reason, it can’t sell devices in English or Chinese, as it would have to do in the US.

Amazon’s presence in Japan is one of its biggest advantages in the global market.

With iBeacons, Amazon also offers its products to people in the European Union, which makes it more appealing to European consumers.

And while there are many other differences between Japan and the US, these are not among them.

What makes the difference so important is the fact that Amazon is a global company.

While it has a global presence, it has one in Japan.

The fact that it’s in Japan means that it can easily sell devices to its Japanese users, and it can also sell devices for its international customers.

This gives Amazon an advantage in the worldwide market.

What’s more, Japan has more than 500 million internet users, making it a big target for Google and Apple.

Amazon is well positioned to make its presence felt in Japan, and as such, the differences in prices between the companies are no secret.

It also makes it easier for customers to compare prices.

If there are differences between prices in different countries, it helps consumers to compare these prices and to make comparisons that are more accurate.

In an ideal world, the US would also be offering similar prices to the Japanese as well.

However of course, the reality is that the US doesn’t actually have a large internet user base, and Google and the Apple are still in the business of selling their devices to the Chinese.

This makes it difficult for Apple and Apple to compete with Amazon in the domestic market.

However it doesn’t mean that Apple and Amazon can’t compete in the international market.

For example, if Apple is able.

Google’s US stores are the best